The biggest threat to linux may not lie in the ultimate merits of scos case. Sep 25, 2009 november 12, 2003 jed boal, from ksl 5 tvs eyewitness news, provides an overview on sco vs. Since suing ibm in march over allegations that the company put sco unix source code into linux, sco has been countersued by both ibm and linux distributor red hat. Sco was a real unix vendor which was bought by caldera a then respected linux vendor. Prior to ibms involvement, linux was the software equivalent. Linux is a trademark of one linus torvalds, of whom you may have heard. In early 2003, sco filed a lawsuit against ibm for misappropriation of trade secrets. Ibm wins a victory in a legal battle with sco group when a judge orders sco to show the linux software to which it believes it has rights and point out. But sco alleged that ibm had no real interest in the project and just wanted to see what was inside its versions of unix. The complaint alleged that ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibm s linux business.
To make linux of necessary quality for use by enterprise customers, it must be redesigned so that linux also becomes the software equivalent of a luxury car. If the case drags on, most companies in this highly. Sco lawsuit is worse for linux than ibm network world. The project was terminated in may 2001, sco says, alleging that ibm misused its access to the unix software code to help build the linux open standard. The big trial over ownership of linux has all but been resolved and its clear that sco has lost. Linus torvalds comments on scocalderas linuxrelated allegations. Nearly onehalf of scocaldera income from ip licensing and enforcement. In 1995 and 1996, sco acquired the rights of unix and unixware software. Following the partial summary judgment rulings in the sco vs novell slander of title. Appeals court keeps alive the neverending linux case, sco v. If the case drags on, most companies in this highly competitive,fastchanging industry, cant afford to place bets on technology with an uncertain future. Members of the linux community disagree with scos claims. Ibm case in early 2003, sco filed a lawsuit against ibm for misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious interference, unfair competition and breach of contract.
Unix on intels 32bit and 64bit architectures, to benefit ibms linux business. As linux is developed by the community and available for free, the. In early 2003, sco filed a lawsuit against ibm for misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious. The author of this piece seems pretty sure linux will be unaffected by the outcome of this case. In 1992, the yggdrasil project chose the name yggdrasil linuxgnux for its combination of software. They then demanded royalties over anyone that used linux. At the end of last october, the 10th circuit issued an opinion overturning the lower courts summary judgement in favor of ibm on one of scos claims, sending it back to the lower court for trial. This category is for links that are mostly or all about linus torvalds, aspects of, and involvement in, the sco vs. Ibm lawsuit wont go to trial until a related case, sco vs. This machinelearning upstart trained software to snare online drug dealers. Sco says ibm released a sham version of monterey os to prop up aix for power. Sco will need to show how it is able to claim rights to code that it did not create, and that ibm has used in various nonsystem v software platforms. Mar, 2020 the other day i was asked what the odds were that sco would win against ibm. It is an attempt to explain the current actions of ibm against sco in regard to linux.
The seemingly endless legal battle between sco and ibm battle over who owns unix, and perhaps bits of linux, too has reemerged. The sco group asserted that there are legal uncertainties regarding the use of the linux operating system due to alleged violations of ibms unix licenses in the development of linux code at ibm. Sco and ibm have been engaged in a legal dispute over ibms contributions to. Sco vs groklaws pamela jones unix and linux dslreports.
Scocaldera suit against ibm over unix and linux issues. The thing that makes predictions a bit murky is that there are some other motions, aside from the summary judgment motions, that were also not officially decided before. Scos legal war against ibm and linux comes to an end zdnet. The biggest threat to linux may not lie in the ultimate merits of sco s case.
Ibm, is a civil lawsuit in the united states district court of utah. Sco sued ibm in 2003 for violating its intellectual property after. At the end of last october, the 10th circuit issued an opinion overturning the lower courts summary judgement in favor of ibm on one of sco s claims, sending it back to the lower court for trial. Scos contract dispute with ibm has been accompanied by a smear campaign against the whole gnulinux system. Filed a few months ago, scos lawsuit against ibm has rankled the linux community and disconcerted its users. Sco made initial ip claims against ibm in march 6th 20032, and only removed the source code to its linux distribution in may 14th 20033 thus sco have gifted this code to the linux community. Viewed against the backdrop of scos plethora of public statements concerning ibms and others infringement of scos purported s to the unix software, it is astonishing that sco has not offered any competent evidence to create a disputed fact. Appeals court keeps alive the neverending linux case, sco. Novell among them, a status conference hearing was held before judge david nuffer on june 11, 2015.
Nov 02, 2017 coronavirus data centre software security devops business personal. Big blue is hitting back against sco s charges that it misappropriated unix trade secrets and used them in linux. The truth is that the scos lawsuit against ibm could have farreaching implications in the industry, and i need to present the story in a way that i. It is a contract dispute between two companies with. Sco challenged ibm in the courts claiming that code used in linux was owned by them. On the basis of how the two parties were behaving, i offered a range of between 55 and 65 percent. Sco claimed that ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibms linux business. Not many lawsuits, and certainly not this one, deserve to be called the trial of the century. The complaint alleged that ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibms linux business. Big blue is hitting back against scos charges that it misappropriated unix trade secrets and used them in linux. Ibm sco says ibm released a sham version of monterey os to prop up aix for power. Therefore, scocaldera may accuse ibm of misappropriating scoowned software to improve the linux kernel only if that software does not actually ship with the. Scos ceo was quoted in news services on may 29 as having said.
Sco and ibm have been engaged in a legal dispute over ibm s contributions to linux since sco sued the. The sco vs ibm lawsuit has been reopened after us judge david nuffer granted scos motion for reconsideration. To make sense of what he says, one has to know what are the things he claims and names methods and concepts. While sco has yet to provide any publicly available substantial evidence in their case against ibm and linux, timeline inc has already won a us. We believe that some of the sco software code that has ended up in the linux operating system got there through this route. Nzheretic writes, if you are concerned over the treat of lawsuits over intellectual property then you are actually in a better legal position using gpled linux than using microsofts products. May 31, 2003 nzheretic writes, if you are concerned over the treat of lawsuits over intellectual property then you are actually in a better legal position using gpled linux than using microsofts products. The other day i was asked what the odds were that sco would win against ibm. As ibm later contributed plenty of code to linux, and used some sco code in a test version of aix. Computers software operating systems unix sco boycott, lawsuits torvalds, linus. Ibm, novell and red hat have ongoing claims against sco. That case, which is scheduled to be tried later this year, is the one for which sco is attempting. Prior to ibm s involvement, linux was the software equivalent of a bicycle. Sco sues ibm for sharing secrets with unix and linux.
Ibm legal battle over linux may finally be finished. Free and opensource software advocates saw the matter as a cause celebre, and the awardwinning foss legal news site groklaw got its start. The scolinux disputes are a series of legal and public disputes between the software company sco group sco and various linux vendors and users. Sco v ibm sco v linux sco v all of us what should we do about it, if anything. Ibm linuxone enterprise linux servers and solutions for a high performing, secure and scalable linux infrastructure. Prior to ibms involvement, linux was the software equivalent of a bicycle. Shortly thereafter, ibm filed for a rehearing en banc. Sco, gnu and linux gnu project free software foundation.
The battle over unix set to be replayed as sco takes on ibm. Jones has led a relentless online crusade against software maker sco group, posting thousands of articles bashing the company for suing ibm over the linux. Jun 17, 20 judge dale kimball, who had presided over the sco vs ibm case in 2005, noted that. Nuffer noted that he is new to the case and will require all the parties involved to supply him with sufficient details to mull over. Trusted people in the free software community to examine scos claims. Learn how ibm linuxone delivers a secure data server and a hybrid cloud infrastructure in a single enterprise platform. Filed a few months ago, sco s lawsuit against ibm has rankled the linux community and disconcerted its users. Sco claimed that ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibm s linux business. In essence, sco has argued that ibm essentially stole, or. Sco pulls ibms aix license in unix dispute computerworld. In early 2003, sco filed a lawsuit against ibm for misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious interference, unfair competition and breach of contract. But sco made an obvious mistake when it erroneously quoted me as saying that linux is a copy of unix. Microsoft may be the only winner in scos lawsuit against ibm and the open source ideal.
The sco linux disputes are a series of legal and public disputes between the software company sco group and various linux vendors and users. Today, were stating that the alleged actions of ibm and others have caused customers to use a tainted product at sco s expense. Novell vs sco to novells knowledge, the 1995 agreement governing scos purchase. Not many lawsuits, and certainly not this one, deserve to be called the trial of. Debian still refers to its software as gnulinux today. Sco lost its legal battle against ibm and linux long ago, but now the. The legal action the sco group brought against ibm on thursday has nothing to do with linux or the. Difference between ibm and sco basics of ibm and sco ibm, short for international business machines, is a global information technology and. Ibm cant enforce gpl software license computerworld.
Gnulinux is the preferred term advanced by richard stallman and the free software foundation. Scos contract dispute with ibm has been accompanied by a smear campaign against the whole gnu linux system. The decade long legal dispute has descended into a morass of litigation and allegations. Mar 04, 20 initially, there was some debate over what these distributions should be called.
472 320 181 742 453 67 1007 919 582 338 1127 850 198 704 1510 982 274 1456 726 1370 623 1440 392 1519 770 578 445 226 413 948 1085 1460 1379 3 105 1470 168 551 1069 195 225 676 143 820